Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

k-space preconditioning for pdhg #545

Open
fzimmermann89 opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

k-space preconditioning for pdhg #545

fzimmermann89 opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@fzimmermann89
Copy link
Member

fzimmermann89 commented Nov 19, 2024

Accelerating Non-Cartesian MRI Reconstruction Convergence using k-space Preconditioning by Frank Ong, Martin Uecker, and Michael Lustig arxiv suggests to use pdhg with k-space preconditoning.

For a diagonal precondition as proposed, this would in practice resulting the dual stepsize sigma being a tensor in our implementation.
See also how to do their experiments https://github.com/mikgroup/kspace_precond/blob/master/Sense%20Reconstruction.ipynb -- they set sigpy's pdhg stepsize to the precondition

We would also need their methodof obtaining the single- or multi-channel preconditioner.

@koflera
Copy link
Collaborator

koflera commented Nov 20, 2024

Accelerating Non-Cartesian MRI Reconstruction Convergence using k-space Preconditioning by Frank Ong, Martin Uecker, and Michael Lustig arxiv suggests to use pdhg with k-space preconditoning.

For a diagonal precondition as proposed, this would in practice resulting the dual stepsize sigma being a tensor in our implementation. See also how to do their experiments https://github.com/mikgroup/kspace_precond/blob/master/Sense%20Reconstruction.ipynb -- they set sigpy's pdhg stepsize to the precondition

We would also need their methodof obtaining the single- or multi-channel preconditioner.

I agree that would be of high interest... for example, for our TV-unrolling, it would be nice to be able to only use a few iterations of PDHG and already have converged to a decent solution. This would make the approach applicable to non-Cartesian MRI as well, which we on purpose did not consider yet because of those reasons.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants