You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the Blender addon guidelines, addons must comply with PEP8 in order to be approved for distribution with Blender. Since this addon could potentially be useful for a lot of people, I think it would be good to comply with the standards, in case it reaches a level of maturity at which it could be submitted for approval.
I ran the flake8 analysis on the code, and it found many issues, mostly related to whitespace. Fixing these issues would require changes to the entire code base.
I would like to know if such changes are acceptable or if there is a particular reason why the code was formatted this way. If there is no problem, I could make the necessary changes and submit a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
According to the Blender addon guidelines, addons must comply with PEP8 in order to be approved for distribution with Blender. Since this addon could potentially be useful for a lot of people, I think it would be good to comply with the standards, in case it reaches a level of maturity at which it could be submitted for approval.
I ran the flake8 analysis on the code, and it found many issues, mostly related to whitespace. Fixing these issues would require changes to the entire code base.
flake8_results.txt
I would like to know if such changes are acceptable or if there is a particular reason why the code was formatted this way. If there is no problem, I could make the necessary changes and submit a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: