Matching sets and/or maps is difficult because of ordering

[gleenn]

If I have a map with {:a 1 :b 2} or equivalently {:b 2 :a 1} I don't think it's possible to write a single grape expression that matches both of those, even though it's probably relatively common. Is there a way to make a matcher that does order-independent matching, or at least have or-expressions so I could match both cases? The former would definitely be preferable, perhaps a special case for sets and maps?

This is an awesome utility, so thanks for your effort!

[bfontaine]

Hello, you’re right in thinking it’s not possible right now, and I definitely agree this would be very helpful.