You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I taught the R-ecology lessons the past two days, and we got two pieces of feedback in our course evals that I want to pass along here.
Two students found the first graph made in the ggplot2 lesson, rather, phallic. I had not noticed that before, but, now I definitely see what they mean. Could we subset the portal dataset, or something to make that go away?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
after consulting with a few other people about this, it seems that the easiest approach would be to transition soon to the "new" lesson (tidyverse first) which starts with visualization. This lesson uses a subset of the data at the beginning, and later when we revisit visualization after seeing dplyr, we can then make more complex graphs with only a subset of the data or using different colors for the species that don't make the pattern apparent.
I taught the R-ecology lessons the past two days, and we got two pieces of feedback in our course evals that I want to pass along here.
Two students found the first graph made in the ggplot2 lesson, rather, phallic. I had not noticed that before, but, now I definitely see what they mean. Could we subset the portal dataset, or something to make that go away?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: