You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was trying to expose the embedded Alloy UI with the Helm Chart and was confused, that the default when enabling the ingress is a rule for the root path to port 12347, which is the default port for Faro.
From my perspective, the default should be routing to Alloy directly and something like ingress.faro.enabled: true that will add another paths into the rule to direct a subpath to Faro. Setting this to true should also add all required configurations to Grafana Alloy to enable the Faro UI itself.
Let me know your thoughts, I could implement this, but it would be a breaking change for the Helm Chart I guess.
Steps to reproduce
Deploy Grafana Alloy with the Helm Chart, set ingress.enabled: true and check for the created ingress:
What's wrong?
I was trying to expose the embedded Alloy UI with the Helm Chart and was confused, that the default when enabling the ingress is a rule for the root path to port 12347, which is the default port for Faro.
From my perspective, the default should be routing to Alloy directly and something like
ingress.faro.enabled: true
that will add another paths into the rule to direct a subpath to Faro. Setting this to true should also add all required configurations to Grafana Alloy to enable the Faro UI itself.Let me know your thoughts, I could implement this, but it would be a breaking change for the Helm Chart I guess.
Steps to reproduce
Deploy Grafana Alloy with the Helm Chart, set
ingress.enabled: true
and check for the created ingress:System information
Helm Chart 0.10.1, Kubernetes v1.31.4
Software version
Grafana Alloy v1.5.1
Configuration
Logs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: