Maybe using hdevtools?

[ch1bo]

Hi there,

I like your plans for hasky-mode as I recently switched to emacs (spacemacs) and do not (yet?) really like the haskell layer. It might improve upon some shortcomings of haskell-mode using emacs packages ghc (ghc-mod), haskell-snippets, hident, company-ghc, company-cabal and so on.

After reading your ideas I thought hdevtools, in particular flycheck-hdevtools, nicely aligns with your rationale and is a nice addition to the default flycheck support for ghc, stack and hlint. Being the maintainer of the project, I just released version 0.1.4.0 which greatly improves stack support (being the primary use case for most people).

What do you think about it? I know and use haskell on a daily basis but - as said - pretty new on emacs and elisp. Any ideas how I could help out?

[mrkkrp]

Thank you for your interest. I'll take a look at hdevtools this weekend. However, I would not expect lots of activity regarding hasky-mode, because I have less and less free time these days. hasky-extensions was finished because it's small and I was tired of managing lists of extensions without decent automation.

[ch1bo]

Alright good to know. In fact the project came to my attention via a hasky-extensions post on /r/haskell, will try to give that a whirl as well.

Sent from TypeApp

On Aug 9, 2016, 5:13 PM, at 5:13 PM, Mark Karpov notifications@github.com wrote:

Thank you for your interest. I'll take a look at hdevtools this
weekend. However, I would not expect lots of activity regarding
hasky-mode, because I have less and less free time these days.
hasky-extensions was finished because it's small and I was tired of
managing lists of extensions without decent automation.

---

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#2 (comment)