Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] Unable to sign appxpackage due to "ST" being present in the signing certificate subject #640

Open
danielprice-cds opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[BUG] Unable to sign appxpackage due to "ST" being present in the signing certificate subject #640

danielprice-cds opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Needs-Triage Issue needs to be triaged by a member of the core team

Comments

@danielprice-cds
Copy link

Project
MSIX SDK (MakeAppx.exe)

Describe the bug
I am unable to sign a WinUI application as my code signing certificate has ST in the subject which is not permitted in the Publisher element in the AppxManifest.xml

To Reproduce
Create a new WinUI application and sign the app package with a code signing certificate which has a subject containing ST

Expected behavior
The AppxManifest.xml would allow ST in the publisher
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs-Triage Issue needs to be triaged by a member of the core team label Aug 13, 2024
@danielprice-cds danielprice-cds changed the title [BUG] Unable to sign msix due to "ST" being present in the certificate subject [BUG] Unable to sign appxpackage due to "ST" being present in the signing certificate subject Aug 14, 2024
@espresso3389
Copy link

MakeAppx.exe does not allow ST and I've finally got here and found msix-packaging has same issue... I'm using my own fork now :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Needs-Triage Issue needs to be triaged by a member of the core team
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@espresso3389 @danielprice-cds