We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
our current way of specifying params is very verbose. something shorter might be useful for applications.
the PCS format might be a nice idea. it is string based, and we could even parse PCS files if we implement a parser
it is defined here: http://aclib.net/cssc2014/pcs-format.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
if we finish this, we should also allow to export sets to PCS string format
Sorry, something went wrong.
There is also this.
closed by #301 (i.e. ps() shortcuts)?
Yes
No branches or pull requests
our current way of specifying params is very verbose. something shorter might be useful for applications.
the PCS format might be a nice idea. it is string based, and we could even parse PCS files if we implement a parser
it is defined here:
http://aclib.net/cssc2014/pcs-format.pdf
a PR is here Parser for PCS format #155
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: