You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have "ground truth" labels for a subset of my data. Specifically I have a set of clusters that I know to be correct, with nothing that should be added or removed from them.
I'd like to use these resolved clusters to evaluate the quality of my clustering results.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to:
See how my predicted clustering compares to the ground truth clustering.
Compute precision, recall, and cluster metrics based on this set of resolved clusters.
Compare summary statistics (e.g. the average cluster size) between my predicted clustering and the ground truth data.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Some of it is implemented in the er-evaluation package, but it's quite slow with its Pandas implementation. Some of the methods are described in my paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.05622, but I think that stuff needs to be simplified.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your proposal related to a problem?
I have "ground truth" labels for a subset of my data. Specifically I have a set of clusters that I know to be correct, with nothing that should be added or removed from them.
I'd like to use these resolved clusters to evaluate the quality of my clustering results.
Describe the solution you'd like
I'd like to:
Describe alternatives you've considered
Some of it is implemented in the er-evaluation package, but it's quite slow with its Pandas implementation. Some of the methods are described in my paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.05622, but I think that stuff needs to be simplified.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: