Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Epic: safekeepers dynamic membership change (Phase 2) #8614

Open
3 of 21 tasks
koivunej opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 of 21 tasks

Epic: safekeepers dynamic membership change (Phase 2) #8614

koivunej opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
c/storage/safekeeper Component: storage: safekeeper

Comments

@koivunej
Copy link
Member

koivunej commented Aug 6, 2024

Phase 1 enabled runtime changes to walproposer configuration, and a semi-manual routine involving pullign timeline data between safekeepers (#4782)

In this phase, we will implement joint consensus for the safekeeper

Tasks

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
  1. 3 of 3
    koivunej
  2. arpad-m
  3. c/storage/safekeeper
  4. c/storage/safekeeper
    arssher

Later

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
@koivunej koivunej added the c/storage/safekeeper Component: storage: safekeeper label Aug 6, 2024
@jcsp jcsp assigned arpad-m and unassigned koivunej Dec 3, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
…#10406)

## Problem

As part of #8614 we need to
pass options to START_WAL_PUSH.

## Summary of changes

Add two options. `allow_timeline_creation`, default true, disables
implicit timeline creation in the connection from compute. Eventually
such creation will be forbidden completely, but as we migrate to
configurations we need to support both: current mode and configurations
enabled where creation by compute is disabled.

`proto_version` specifies compute <-> sk protocol version. We have it
currently in the first greeting package also, but I plan to change tag
size from u64 to u8, which would make it hard to use. Command is more
appropriate place for it anyway.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c/storage/safekeeper Component: storage: safekeeper
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants