Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate kinesis from this bootstrap repo #29

Open
humblelistener opened this issue Feb 12, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Separate kinesis from this bootstrap repo #29

humblelistener opened this issue Feb 12, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@humblelistener
Copy link
Collaborator

humblelistener commented Feb 12, 2017

While the capability to consume and produce kinesis streams is a wonderful bootstrap set up, It is a good idea to separate the kinesis consumer itself into a separate NuGet package and consume it from here.

I am referring to the KinesisNet folder in worker service

@jimmyp

@humblelistener humblelistener changed the title Should we seperate kinesis from this bootstrap repo Separate kinesis from this bootstrap repo Feb 12, 2017
@jimmyp
Copy link
Contributor

jimmyp commented Feb 13, 2017

Agreed. To be clear, the intention is however to be able to clone and run both the infra and code repos and be consuming events from a stream straight away.

@jimmyp
Copy link
Contributor

jimmyp commented Jun 20, 2017

@humblelistener has seperate the Kinesis sample to a seperate project. Next step is to create a nuget package. Possibly in a seperate repo?

@humblelistener
Copy link
Collaborator Author

humblelistener commented Jun 20, 2017 via email

@jimmyp
Copy link
Contributor

jimmyp commented Jun 22, 2017

Ideally we could make a PR to https://github.com/sbarski/KinesisNet with our changes that support dot net core and add publishing of a nuget package

@humblelistener
Copy link
Collaborator Author

humblelistener commented Jun 22, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants