You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I love using your AutoTracker as background music as I work. Sometimes I noticed that the next pattern is very different and it can be startling. I would love a feature to enable an option to change less per new pattern.
For example;
You start with no seed provided and it generate a seed of [0x020102A4CD0887CB0B]
When that has played, if the option is checked, only one digit changes therefore making it sound like the same song but only changing one thing. The seed is now [0x050102A4CD0887CB0B]
Once this one has played, the next change is again minimal, like [0x050102A46D0887AB0B]
To make it more usable to more people, you could even make it a slider to choose how much 'randomness' to include in the next pattern.
I would try to make this change myself in a Fork but I am not much of a software developer.
If you do not want to do it, I totally understand. I love your program either way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I love using your AutoTracker as background music as I work. Sometimes I noticed that the next pattern is very different and it can be startling. I would love a feature to enable an option to change less per new pattern.
For example;
You start with no seed provided and it generate a seed of [0x020102A4CD0887CB0B]
When that has played, if the option is checked, only one digit changes therefore making it sound like the same song but only changing one thing. The seed is now [0x050102A4CD0887CB0B]
Once this one has played, the next change is again minimal, like [0x050102A46D0887AB0B]
To make it more usable to more people, you could even make it a slider to choose how much 'randomness' to include in the next pattern.
I would try to make this change myself in a Fork but I am not much of a software developer.
If you do not want to do it, I totally understand. I love your program either way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: