Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
Could you please suggest which message would be better in that case? The failure you have is that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ahhh OK, I read this output wrong, I thought this dependency was correctly resolved. And didn't look at the jar. Since I cannot fix the third party, maybe this can be fixed with something like (pseudo code as I'm on mobile now) :
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Well, you can put the license file under your source control under By default, it would check overrideLicense("org.hamcrest:$lib:2.2") {
// https://github.com/hamcrest/JavaHamcrest/issues/264
// pom.xml lists "New BSD License", however it is BSD_3
expectedLicense = SpdxLicense.BSD_3_Clause
licenseFiles = "hamcrest"
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
OK, great thanks a lot ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I guess the ticket can be closed ! I wonder if GH issues can be moved to discussions ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
When running the license gather plugin, it may happen that
LICENSE-like
files are missing, butthe plugin does ot report which one, which is really tedious to identify if there are a lot of them.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions