Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: MPSDynamics v1.1.0 #123935

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: 8fc8f346-e1eb-498f-94db-02ffe92d8134
Repo: https://github.com/shareloqs/MPSDynamics.jl.git
Tree: 1fa8774e6ed13182f64a4bdee638f586c896cfb5

Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅

Your new package registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged when the mandatory waiting period (3 days) has elapsed.

3. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@tfmlaX
Copy link

tfmlaX commented Jan 29, 2025

Hi! Would it be possible for the PR to be manually merged? The package name is indeed similar to one already existing, yet our package is already used and known as MPSDynamics.jl in the field of open quantum systems: See this software paper and this list of publications using the package for instance.
And given that MPS refers to Matrix Product States I don't think that there would be any ambiguity with MNP.
Thank you for your help! Cheers!

[noblock]

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot added the AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. label Jan 29, 2025
@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot removed the AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. label Jan 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants