-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify output_name #476
Open
Qrouger
wants to merge
1
commit into
KosinskiLab:main
Choose a base branch
from
Qrouger:patch-2
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Simplify output_name #476
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would this work if is the delimiter is other than '+'?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Between differents proteins, delimiter is always "+", if there is no "+" in self.input[0] so list_oligo will look like [P13979] (monomer) or [P13979:2] (dimere)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I mean we can choose a delimiter when run structure predictions. The '+' symbol is the default one, but it can be set to any other character:
https://github.com/KosinskiLab/AlphaPulldown/blob/main/alphapulldown/scripts/run_structure_prediction.py#L153
Therefore we have to pass the delimiter flag as well, otherwise it will not work for any custom delimiters other than '+'.
Then the code would look like:
list_oligo = self.input[0].split(self.delimiter)
and we need to pass this delimiter beforehand e.g.
object_to_model = MultimericObject( interactors=interactors, delimiter=delimiter, ...
On the other hand, maybe it makes more sense to move all this logic from objects.py to modelling_setup.py and keep MultimericObject logic as simple as possible (given it's already far from being simple)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, sorry I don't know delimiter flag exist. Yes that make more sense to add this at modelling_setup.py.