Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a configuration to determine whether to enable the point-to-point network interface #15032

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

finefuture
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change?

Related #15031

Checklist

  • Make sure there is a GitHub_issue field for the change.
  • Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
  • Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction. If the new feature or significant change is committed, please remember to add sample in dubbo samples project.
  • Make sure gitHub actions can pass. Why the workflow is failing and how to fix it?

… network interface

Add a configuration to determine whether to enable the point-to-point network interface
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 3, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.74%. Comparing base (82274d9) to head (ba832d8).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...n/java/org/apache/dubbo/common/utils/NetUtils.java 0.00% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                3.3   #15032   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     60.74%   60.74%           
+ Complexity    10876    10865   -11     
=========================================
  Files          1882     1882           
  Lines         86004    86007    +3     
  Branches      12884    12886    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          52244    52249    +5     
  Misses        28307    28307           
+ Partials       5453     5451    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration-tests 32.99% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
samples-tests 29.20% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unit-tests 58.90% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@finefuture finefuture requested a review from AlbumenJ January 6, 2025 02:37
@AlbumenJ AlbumenJ merged commit f0dd47a into apache:3.3 Jan 10, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants