Introducing a memory control mechanism during the query planning stage

[lancelly]

This PR mainly introduces a memory control mechanism during the query planning stage. Currently, the IoTDB query engine does not implement memory control at the FE (Frontend) stage. In scenarios with massive series queries (e.g., select * from root.**), the query plans generated at the FE stage can become excessively large. Roughly estimating, the size of a single SeriesScanNode is about 1/2 KB, which means that two million series corresponding to two million SeriesScanNodes would occupy 1 GB, posing a potential risk of Out-Of-Memory (OOM). In high concurrency scenarios, even if a single query plan is not large, the total memory occupied by multiple query plans can still lead to OOM.
Therefore, it is now desired to introduce memory size control for FE query plans within the query engine.
Related docs：https://apache-iotdb.feishu.cn/docx/F7nidsysKofhO4xTi35cuDhynCh

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 74.92795% with 87 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.37%. Comparing base (44ed961) to head (fdb3f1b).
Report is 32 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...e/iotdb/db/queryengine/common/MPPQueryContext.java	38.46%	16 Missing ⚠️
...ueryengine/plan/planner/LocalExecutionPlanner.java	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
.../plan/expression/other/CaseWhenThenExpression.java	22.22%	7 Missing ⚠️
...db/db/queryengine/plan/analyze/AnalyzeVisitor.java	87.50%	4 Missing ⚠️
.../db/queryengine/plan/analyze/TemplatedAnalyze.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...ine/plan/expression/ternary/BetweenExpression.java	33.33%	4 Missing ⚠️
...b/queryengine/plan/planner/LogicalPlanBuilder.java	77.77%	4 Missing ⚠️
...b/db/queryengine/plan/analyze/ExpressionUtils.java	82.35%	3 Missing ⚠️
...gine/plan/expression/multi/FunctionExpression.java	84.21%	3 Missing ⚠️
...ueryengine/plan/expression/unary/InExpression.java	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 15 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #12573      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     43.50%   43.37%   -0.14%     
  Complexity       69       69              
============================================
  Files          3125     3164      +39     
  Lines        194301   196674    +2373     
  Branches      23168    23425     +257     
============================================
+ Hits          84536    85308     +772     
- Misses       109765   111366    +1601     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JackieTien97]

Think about the query retry logic and the last remaining memory(less than 1MB), you can reserve that before dispatch.

[JackieTien97]

Suggested change

	LOCAL_EXECUTION_PLANNER.releaseToFreeMemoryForOperators(reservedBytesInTotalForFrontEnd);
	reservedBytesInTotalForFrontEnd = 0;
	if (reservedBytesInTotalForFrontEnd != 0) {
	LOCAL_EXECUTION_PLANNER.releaseToFreeMemoryForOperators(reservedBytesInTotalForFrontEnd);
	reservedBytesInTotalForFrontEnd = 0;
	}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud