Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pipe IT: Table model IT test And tree model IT test ayer #14719

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

luoluoyuyu
Copy link
Contributor

Description

As the title said


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu self-assigned this Jan 17, 2025
@luoluoyuyu luoluoyuyu changed the title Pipe IT: Pipe table model IT test layer Pipe IT: Pipe table model IT And tree model IT layer Jan 20, 2025
@luoluoyuyu luoluoyuyu changed the title Pipe IT: Pipe table model IT And tree model IT layer Pipe IT: table model IT test And tree model IT test ayer Jan 20, 2025
@luoluoyuyu luoluoyuyu changed the title Pipe IT: table model IT test And tree model IT test ayer Pipe IT: Table model IT test And tree model IT test ayer Jan 20, 2025
@luoluoyuyu luoluoyuyu marked this pull request as draft January 23, 2025 03:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants