chore: git branches IT #38805
chore: git branches IT #38805
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive modifications to the Git-related file handling and operations across multiple classes in the Appsmith server. The changes focus on centralizing constants, refining method signatures, enhancing logging, and improving error handling in Git-related services. Key areas of modification include file utilities, service implementations, and integration tests, with an emphasis on standardizing file path management and Git reference handling. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GitService
participant FileUtils
participant GitHandler
Client->>GitService: Create Git Reference
GitService->>FileUtils: Prepare Artifact
FileUtils-->>GitService: Artifact Prepared
GitService->>GitHandler: Initialize Repository
GitHandler-->>GitService: Repository Ready
GitService->>GitHandler: Commit Changes
GitHandler-->>GitService: Commit Successful
GitService-->>Client: Reference Created
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
skip-changelog
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java (1)
Line range hint
1095-1129: Refine error handling during commit failuresDetaching the remote repository on any commit failure might be too aggressive. Handle specific exceptions to prevent unnecessary detachment due to transient errors.
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/base/ThemeServiceCEImpl.java (1)
269-270: Consider handling potential errors in the reactive chain.While the implementation is correct, consider adding error handling for cases where
getDefaultThemeId()fails.Mono<String> publishedThemeIdMono = Mono.justOrEmpty(application.getPublishedModeThemeId()) - .switchIfEmpty(getDefaultThemeId()); + .switchIfEmpty(getDefaultThemeId() + .onErrorResume(error -> { + log.error("Error getting default theme id", error); + return Mono.error(new AppsmithException(AppsmithError.THEME_NOT_FOUND)); + }));app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java (1)
367-376: Improve null handling with Optional.While the current implementation handles null collections correctly, consider using Optional for a more idiomatic Java approach.
- List<ApplicationPage> unPublishedPages = CollectionUtils.isEmpty(application.getPages()) - ? new ArrayList<>() - : application.getPages(); + List<ApplicationPage> unPublishedPages = Optional.ofNullable(application.getPages()) + .orElseGet(ArrayList::new); - List<ApplicationPage> publishedPages = CollectionUtils.isEmpty(application.getPublishedPages()) - ? new ArrayList<>() - : application.getPublishedPages(); + List<ApplicationPage> publishedPages = Optional.ofNullable(application.getPublishedPages()) + .orElseGet(ArrayList::new);app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java (2)
738-754: Consider using a custom exception instead of RuntimeExceptionWhile the error handling includes proper logging, throwing a RuntimeException might be too generic. Consider:
- Creating a custom exception type for widget serialization errors
- Using AppsmithPluginException to maintain consistency with other error handling in the codebase
738-754: Consider using a custom exception for better error handling.While the current error handling is good, consider creating a custom exception instead of using RuntimeException. This would provide better error classification and handling specific to widget deserialization failures.
- throw new RuntimeException(jsonProcessingException); + throw new WidgetDeserializationException("Failed to deserialize widget: " + entry.getKey().getFilePath(), jsonProcessingException);app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/it/com/appsmith/server/git/GitBranchesIT.java (5)
208-208: Fix typo in commentCorrect the typo in the comment: "ane" should be "an".
Apply this diff:
- // TODO: Check why there is ane extra commit + // TODO: Check why there is an extra commit
209-209: Remove commented-out codeAvoid leaving commented-out code. If the assertion is still needed, uncomment it; otherwise, remove it to keep the codebase clean.
230-232: Uncomment or remove the test assertionDecide whether the
fail("Auto-commit took too long");statement is necessary. If it is, uncomment it to ensure the test behaves as expected; if not, remove it along with the TODO comment.
248-255: Remove commented-out error message blockCommented-out error messages can clutter the code. Consider removing this block for better readability.
385-386: Complete the incomplete commentThe comment starting with "Since the status" appears incomplete. Please complete it or remove it.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java (2)
624-633: Reduce duplication inArtifactJsonTransformationDTOcreationConsider refactoring the creation of
ArtifactJsonTransformationDTOforbaseRefTransformationDTOandcreateRefTransformationDTOto avoid code duplication.
2992-2993: Simplify lambda expression inzipWhenSince
sourceStatusDTOisn't used, replace.zipWhen(sourceStatusDTO -> destinationBranchStatusMono)with.zipWith(destinationBranchStatusMono)for clarity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/FileUtilsCEImpl.java(25 hunks)app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/operations/FileOperationsCEv2Impl.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/handler/ce/FSGitHandlerCEImpl.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-interfaces/src/main/java/com/appsmith/external/git/constants/ce/GitConstantsCE.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java(3 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java(20 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/GitHandlingServiceCE.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/dtos/ArtifactJsonTransformationDTO.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/fs/GitFSServiceCEImpl.java(2 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/CommonGitFileUtilsCE.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/base/ThemeServiceCEImpl.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/importable/ThemeImportableServiceCEImpl.java(1 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/it/com/appsmith/server/git/GitBranchesIT.java(19 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- app/server/appsmith-interfaces/src/main/java/com/appsmith/external/git/constants/ce/GitConstantsCE.java
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/helpers/ce/CommonGitFileUtilsCE.java
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (2)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java
- app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/FileUtilsCEImpl.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: server-spotless / spotless-check
- GitHub Check: server-unit-tests / server-unit-tests
🔇 Additional comments (20)
app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/handler/ce/FSGitHandlerCEImpl.java (2)
439-445: LGTM! Appropriate log level for branch operations.The elevation of log level from debug to info for branch checkout operations improves operational visibility of significant Git operations.
615-620: LGTM! Appropriate log level for status checks.The elevation of log level from debug to info for repository status checks improves operational visibility of important Git operations.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/dtos/ArtifactJsonTransformationDTO.java (2)
Line range hint
8-8: Address or track the TODO comment.The TODO comment suggests finding a better name for this DTO. Consider creating a tracking issue if this can't be addressed immediately.
Would you like me to suggest alternative names based on the DTO's purpose or help create a tracking issue?
38-44: LGTM! Well-structured constructor addition.The new constructor is properly implemented, maintaining consistency with the existing pattern while adding the ability to specify the
artifactTypeat construction time.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/base/ThemeServiceCEImpl.java (2)
264-268: Well-documented theme publishing concept!The comments clearly explain the rationale behind theme copying during publishing, which is crucial for maintaining code clarity.
272-274: LGTM: Robust theme publishing implementation.The implementation correctly handles the theme publishing flow by:
- Using the existing published theme ID if available
- Falling back to default theme ID for new applications
- Saving the theme with appropriate application mode
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/imports/ApplicationImportServiceCEImpl.java (1)
56-57: LGTM! Good use of static imports.The static imports improve code readability by reducing the need to prefix the constants with their class name.
app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/operations/FileOperationsCEv2Impl.java (1)
170-172: LGTM! Clean refactoring.The simplification of the return statement maintains the same logic while reducing unnecessary variable assignment.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/importable/ThemeImportableServiceCEImpl.java (3)
Line range hint
41-95: LGTM! Well-documented implementation.The code maintains good separation of concerns and includes comprehensive documentation explaining the theme import logic and decision tree.
Line range hint
156-167: Consider utilizing theisContextAgnosticparameter.The new overloaded method ignores the
isContextAgnosticparameter. If this parameter is meant to affect the import behavior, it should be utilized in the implementation.
75-82: Verify theme state consistency after removing published theme handling.The simplified theme import logic now only handles unpublished themes. While this streamlines the code, we should ensure this doesn't affect theme state consistency during application publishing.
✅ Verification successful
Theme state consistency is maintained through application publishing flow
The simplified theme import is safe as theme publishing is properly handled by
ApplicationPageServiceCEImpl.publish()which callsThemeService.publishTheme(). This maintains theme state consistency during the application publishing process.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for theme publishing related code to verify consistency rg -l "publishTheme|publishedTheme" --type javaLength of output: 1507
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check theme service interface and implementation ast-grep --pattern 'interface ThemeServiceCE { $$$ }' app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/base/ThemeServiceCE.java echo "---" ast-grep --pattern 'class ThemeServiceCEImpl $_ { $$$ }' app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/base/ThemeServiceCEImpl.javaLength of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the content of ThemeImportableServiceCEImpl and search for theme publishing methods cat app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/themes/importable/ThemeImportableServiceCEImpl.java echo "---" # Search for theme publishing method calls rg "publishTheme|publishedTheme" --type java -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 38335
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java (4)
73-74: LGTM - New imports for file format version constants
194-197: LGTM - Added file format version to metadataProperly adds version tracking to the metadata object.
73-74: LGTM! Imports are properly utilized.The new imports for file format versioning constants are correctly used in the metadata handling logic.
194-197: LGTM! Good practice for version management.Adding file format version to metadata enables proper version compatibility checks during Git operations.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/it/com/appsmith/server/git/GitBranchesIT.java (2)
356-358: Exception handling is appropriateThe test correctly verifies that committing to a protected branch fails as expected.
514-514: Verify the status after discarding changesEnsure that after discarding changes, the repository status is clean. Add an assertion to verify this.
Apply this diff:
GitStatusDTO discardableStatus = centralGitService.getStatus(checkedOutFooArtifact.getId(), artifactType, false, GitType.FILE_SYSTEM).block(); assertThat(discardableStatus).isNotNull(); assertThat(discardableStatus.getIsClean()).isFalse(); + // Verify status after discarding changes + Artifact discardedFoo = centralGitService.discardChanges(checkedOutFooArtifact.getId(), artifactType, GitType.FILE_SYSTEM).block(); + GitStatusDTO discardedStatus = centralGitService.getStatus(checkedOutFooArtifact.getId(), artifactType, false, GitType.FILE_SYSTEM).block(); + assertThat(discardedStatus).isNotNull(); + assertThat(discardedStatus.getIsClean()).isTrue();app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java (1)
Line range hint
513-536: Implementation of remote reference checkout appears correctThe logic for handling remote reference checkout and artifact creation looks appropriate.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/GitHandlingServiceCE.java (1)
90-93: Verify update ofcreateGitReferencemethod signatureThe method signature now includes
GitArtifactMetadata baseGitData. Ensure all implementations and calls tocreateGitReferenceare updated accordingly.app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/fs/GitFSServiceCEImpl.java (1)
324-325: PassreadmeFileNametogetRepoSuffixPathIncluding
readmeFileNameenhances flexibility in specifying file paths.
| @@ -136,7 +139,7 @@ public class GitBranchesIT { | |||
| GitServerInitializerExtension gitServerInitializerExtension; | |||
|
|
|||
| @Autowired | |||
| CommonGitService commonGitService; | |||
| CentralGitService centralGitService; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add @Autowired annotation for centralGitService
To ensure centralGitService is properly injected by Spring, add the @Autowired annotation.
Apply this diff:
+ @Autowired
CentralGitService centralGitService;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| CentralGitService centralGitService; | |
| @Autowired | |
| CentralGitService centralGitService; |
| GitArtifactMetadata baseGitMetadata = baseArtifact.getGitArtifactMetadata(); | ||
| localBranches.remove(baseGitMetadata.getRefName()); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure null safety for baseGitMetadata
Add null checks for baseGitMetadata and baseGitMetadata.getRefName() to prevent potential NullPointerException.
| ArtifactJsonTransformationDTO jsonTransformationDTO, GitArtifactMetadata baseGitData, GitRefDTO gitRefDTO) { | ||
| GitArtifactHelper<?> gitArtifactHelper = | ||
| gitArtifactHelperResolver.getArtifactHelper(jsonTransformationDTO.getArtifactType()); | ||
|
|
||
| String remoteUrl = baseGitData.getRemoteUrl(); | ||
| String publicKey = baseGitData.getGitAuth().getPublicKey(); | ||
| String privateKey = baseGitData.getGitAuth().getPrivateKey(); | ||
|
|
||
| Path repoSuffix = gitArtifactHelper.getRepoSuffixPath( | ||
| jsonTransformationDTO.getWorkspaceId(), | ||
| jsonTransformationDTO.getBaseArtifactId(), | ||
| jsonTransformationDTO.getRepoName()); | ||
|
|
||
| return fsGitHandler.createAndCheckoutReference(repoSuffix, gitRefDTO); | ||
| // TODO: add the checkout to the current branch as well. | ||
| return fsGitHandler | ||
| .createAndCheckoutReference(repoSuffix, gitRefDTO) | ||
| .then(fsGitHandler.pushApplication( | ||
| repoSuffix, remoteUrl, publicKey, privateKey, gitRefDTO.getRefName())); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null checks for baseGitData and its GitAuth properties
Ensure baseGitData, baseGitData.getGitAuth(), getPublicKey(), and getPrivateKey() are not null to prevent potential NullPointerException.
Failed server tests
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java (1)
738-754: Improve error handling in widget serialization.The error handling for JSON processing could be enhanced with more specific error details.
- log.error("Error while deserializing widget with file path {}", entry.getKey().getFilePath()); + log.error("Error while deserializing widget with file path {}. Error: {}", + entry.getKey().getFilePath(), + jsonProcessingException.getMessage());app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/FileUtilsCEImpl.java (1)
Line range hint
3008-3031: Enhance merge status error handling.The error handling for merge status could be improved with more specific error types.
- if (error instanceof AppsmithException) { + if (error instanceof AppsmithException || error instanceof GitAPIException) { mergeStatus.setMessage(error.getMessage()); + mergeStatus.setErrorType(error.getClass().getSimpleName());
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/FileUtilsCEImpl.java(25 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java(3 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java(21 hunks)app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/common/CommonGitServiceCEImpl.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: perform-test / rts-build / build
- GitHub Check: perform-test / server-build / server-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: perform-test / client-build / client-build
- GitHub Check: server-unit-tests / server-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: server-spotless / spotless-check
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/applications/git/ApplicationGitFileUtilsCEImpl.java (2)
70-74: LGTM! Imports are well organized.The imports for Git-related constants are properly organized and follow the standard Java import conventions.
194-196: LGTM! File format version is properly added to metadata.The file format version is correctly added to the metadata JSON object, which is essential for version compatibility checks.
app/server/appsmith-git/src/main/java/com/appsmith/git/files/FileUtilsCEImpl.java (3)
270-271: LGTM! Improved file path validation.The file path validation logic is properly enhanced to handle both regular files and empty directories.
297-297: LGTM! Consistent README file handling.The README file handling is consistent across the codebase using the constant
README_FILE_NAME.Also applies to: 1076-1076
Line range hint
2748-2749: LGTM! Proper branch status handling.The branch status checks are properly implemented with appropriate error handling.
Also applies to: 2992-2993
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/git/central/CentralGitServiceCEImpl.java (1)
2592-2601: LGTM! Well-structured artifact generation method.The
generateArtifactForRefCreationmethod is well-structured and follows proper permission checks.
Failed server tests
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/it/com/appsmith/server/git/GitBranchesITWithCentralService.java (5)
172-175: Follow-up on the TODO.
The comment mentions making the file path relative and exploring the use of the controller layer. Addressing these improvements will help reduce path coupling and can increase the test’s representativeness.Would you like me to create a follow-up issue or propose a refactor to handle the file path rework?
225-236: Use a more robust waiting strategy for auto-commit.
The manualThread.sleep(500)approach can introduce flakiness if the system is slow or has intermittent delays. A more resilient solution involves polling a specific reactive endpoint or using built-in Reactor retry/backoff strategies.
457-459: Review local checkout approach before deleting.
The comment wonders if there's reliance on auto-commit for branch switching prior to deletion. Investigate whether forcibly checking out “bar” is the best approach or if a cleanup or forced discard is more appropriate.
540-541: Better clarify merge fail messages.
Test ensures merges fail when local changes exist, but the message might be vague in certain edge cases. Consider clarifying or elaborating the error message for faster root cause analysis.
613-617: Use consistent naming for the auto-commit progress method.
The helper methodgetAutocommitProgressis descriptive but consider standardizing naming across the codebase (e.g., “getAutoCommitStatus” or “fetchAutoCommitState”).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/it/com/appsmith/server/git/GitBranchesITWithCentralService.java(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: perform-test / rts-build / build
- GitHub Check: perform-test / client-build / client-build
- GitHub Check: server-unit-tests / server-unit-tests
- GitHub Check: server-spotless / spotless-check
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/it/com/appsmith/server/git/GitBranchesITWithCentralService.java (6)
60-122: Document and maintain test lifecycle steps in code comments.
The comprehensive docstring meticulously explains each stage of the Git workflow tested. Consider keeping the docstring updated whenever you modify or extend the test flow to ensure new contributors can easily follow the end-to-end sequence.
230-233: Restore the assertion or consider a max retry count for auto-commit.
The test currently comments out thefail("Auto-commit took too long")call, which reduces the test's reliability. If auto-commit stalls, the test won’t fail and might silently pass.
351-354: Confirm that branch protection rules are synchronized.
The restricted branch is assigned, but ensure that any existing local references or ephemeral states reconcile with the server. This is crucial for consistent behavior in team environments.
525-527: Revisit the diff on import side-effects.
A TODO suggests on-page load triggers a diff. Confirm whether these artifact changes are expected and if they're legitimate or can be suppressed for certain test scenarios.
591-610: Check cleanup consistency when disconnecting artifacts.
The test verifies that branchesfoo,bar, andbazare removed, but check that no leftover references, hooks, or partial states remain.
208-210: Investigate the unexpected extra commit.
A second commit appearing immediately could be caused by an automatic commit hook, a leftover file change, or a mismatch in the test environment.Use the following script to detect any phantom changes:
## Description > [!TIP] > _Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team)._ > > _Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR._ Fixes #`Issue Number` _or_ Fixes `Issue URL` > [!WARNING] > _If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid._ ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!CAUTION] > If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No
Description
Tip
Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.
Fixes #
Issue Numberor
Fixes
Issue URLWarning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git, @tag.ImportExport"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12983176503
Commit: 9462078
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.Git, @tag.ImportExportSpec:
Mon, 27 Jan 2025 07:09:02 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests