Updated coding-style.md to point to the new dotnet format repo #101572
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
the
community-contribution
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-infrastructure-libraries |
stephentoub
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2024
|
Thanks |
|
Noting that dotnet/format recently moved to dotnet/sdk, should we update it to link there yet? |
|
Yes that would be good |
matouskozak
pushed a commit
to matouskozak/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2024
michaelgsharp
pushed a commit
to michaelgsharp/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I updated the coding-style.md file to point to the new repo for the dotnet format command/tool. I'm not sure if you still use the old codeformatter tool, but I found it a bit odd when I was looking at the coding-style.md file that it linked to a archived/deprecated project so I chose to update the link since I couldn't find any pr's rejected on this subject.