Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove deprecated worker configuration in workers-bash-script #18113

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

qashlan
Copy link

@qashlan qashlan commented Jan 28, 2025

Pull Request Checklist

  • Pull request is based on the develop branch
  • Pull request includes a changelog file. The entry should:
    • Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users. "Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers." instead of "Moved X method from EventStore to EventWorkerStore.".
    • Use markdown where necessary, mostly for code blocks.
    • End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
    • Start with a capital letter.
    • Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by @github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the entry.
  • Code style is correct
    (run the linters)

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 28, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@qashlan qashlan changed the title remove deprecated worker configuration in bash script remove deprecated worker configuration in workers-bash-script Jan 28, 2025
@qashlan qashlan marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2025 23:02
@qashlan qashlan requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2025 23:02
@qashlan qashlan force-pushed the develop branch 2 times, most recently from 9af3762 to 7a0b6b8 Compare January 29, 2025 10:41
@qashlan qashlan closed this Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants