Update npm package @types/express to v5

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@types/express (source)	resolutions	major	4.17.21 -> 5.0.0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[CiaranMn]

This should be updated along with express itself

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.21%. Comparing base (72a325f) to head (79c4eb7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5970   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   21.21%   21.21%           
=======================================
  Files         573      573           
  Lines       19658    19658           
  Branches     2870     2870           
=======================================
  Hits         4171     4171           
  Misses      15435    15435           
  Partials       52       52           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.14% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	48.69% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.91% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.985 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.49 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.730 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.21 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$85.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$80.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.698 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$71.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.799 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$88.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 394 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$97.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$37.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$52.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.721 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$47.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.615 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$65.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.678 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.705 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$176 \mathrm{ms} \pm 576 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}110 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 134 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}25.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.33 \mathrm{s} \pm 537 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.17 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.59 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.759 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.74 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.288 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph