H-4007: Fix benchmark CI

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

The matrix names were changed but two lines were forgotten to be adjusted.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.22%. Comparing base (105bda9) to head (fbfa5e7).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6338      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   21.05%   21.22%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         580      580              
  Lines       19817    19841      +24     
  Branches     2929     2943      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         4173     4212      +39     
+ Misses      15592    15572      -20     
- Partials       52       57       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.34% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.14% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (+1.81%)	⬆️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.91% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.81% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.139 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.09 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.13 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.639 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.85 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$87.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$82.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 535 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$74.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.337 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$90.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 439 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.494 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$99.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 502 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.788 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$57.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.460 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$180 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.59 \mathrm{s} \pm 283 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1967 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.686 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.231 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.77 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph