Update README.md

[gitworkflows]

User description

Notes for Reviewers

This PR fixes #

Signed commits

• [*] Yes, I signed my commits.

---

PR Type

documentation

---

Description

• Removed introductory HTML paragraph that described the AI agent.
• Removed the NPM package badge and version information from the README.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Documentation	README.md Remove introductory text and badge from README                      README.md Removed introductory HTML paragraph about the AI agent. Removed NPM package badge and version information. +0/-9

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the README.md by removing introductory paragraphs about the AI agent's purpose and functionality, while retaining installation instructions, usage guidelines, and configuration options.
  • Updated contact information for feedback, changing the Twitter handle to @khulnasoft.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR simplifies the README.md file by removing redundant header content while maintaining the core project description.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Streamlined the README header section	Removed descriptive paragraph about AI agent functionality Removed NPM package badge and link Kept the main project title and description	README.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the README.md file for the Micro AI project. The modifications involve the removal of introductory paragraphs that outlined the AI agent's purpose and functionality, including a version badge. The remaining content, such as installation instructions, usage guidelines, and configuration options, remains unchanged, preserving the overall structure of the document.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Removed introductory paragraphs describing the AI agent's purpose and functionality, including a version badge. Updated contact information for feedback. Other sections remain intact.

Poem

In the garden where knowledge grows,
A rabbit hops where the soft wind blows.
With words once there, now taken away,
The path is clear for a brighter day.
Installation and usage, still in sight,
Our Micro AI shines ever so bright! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f8e9db and 272d7fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No major issues detected

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @gitworkflows - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Please provide a description explaining why these changes are needed and include the related issue number.
• The removal of the project description and NPM badge reduces the README's usefulness. Please restore this content or explain why it needs to be removed.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[sourcery-ai]

suggestion: Consider keeping the NPM version badge in Markdown format

The NPM version badge is helpful for users to quickly check if they're using the latest version. Consider adding it back using Markdown syntax:

Suggested change

	<a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/@khulnasoft.com/micro-ai"><img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/@khulnasoft.com/micro-ai" alt="Current version"></a>
	[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@khulnasoft.com/micro-ai)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

CI Feedback 🧐

A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:

Action: Run Build

Failed stage: Lint [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed during the linting step because of code formatting issues: Prettier detected formatting problems in 2 files: 1. README.md 2. src/tests/integration/add.spec.ts The code needs to be formatted using Prettier before committing

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 533: shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0} 534: ##[endgroup] 535: > @khulnasoft.com/micro-ai@0.1.5 lint 536: > prettier --check . && eslint 537: Checking formatting... 538: [warn] README.md 539: [warn] src/tests/integration/add.spec.ts 540: [warn] Code style issues found in 2 files. Forgot to run Prettier? 541: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.