Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test ingest_benchmark with different stripe size and also PostgreSQL version 17 #10509

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

Bodobolero
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

We want to verify if pageserver stripe size has an impact on ingest performance.
We want to verify if ingest performance has improved or regressed with postgres version 17.

Summary of changes

  • Allow to create new project with different postgres versions
  • allow to pre-shard new project with different stripe sizes instead of relying on storage manager to shard_split the project once a threshold is exceeded

@Bodobolero Bodobolero requested review from a team as code owners January 27, 2025 09:34
@Bodobolero Bodobolero requested review from knizhnik and MMeent January 27, 2025 09:34
@Bodobolero Bodobolero marked this pull request as draft January 27, 2025 09:46
@Bodobolero
Copy link
Contributor Author

this PR contains unwanted submodule changes- I will create a new one without those

@Bodobolero Bodobolero closed this Jan 27, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
…version 17 (#10510)

We want to verify if pageserver stripe size has an impact on ingest
performance.
We want to verify if ingest performance has improved or regressed with
postgres version 17.

## Summary of changes

- Allow to create new project with different postgres versions
- allow to pre-shard new project with different stripe sizes instead of
relying on storage manager to shard_split the project once a threshold
is exceeded

Replaces #10509

Test run https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/actions/runs/12986410381
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant