Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove timestamp suffix #97

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Remove timestamp suffix #97

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/nanostring branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closes #69

@nschcolnicov nschcolnicov self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 14, 2024

nf-core pipelines lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit efda6e2

+| ✅ 199 tests passed       |+
!| ❗   2 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 3.0.2
  • Run at 2024-11-14 21:12:06

@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apeltzer The fix for the issue is fairly straightforward, it also helps in allowing the module to resume execution from cache. I wasn't able to find a scenario where not having the timestamp suffix would cause any issues, but still I would like to have your input @christopher-mohr to confirm that we can safely remove it

@apeltzer apeltzer merged commit c62a5f1 into dev Nov 14, 2024
6 checks passed
@apeltzer apeltzer deleted the issue_69 branch November 14, 2024 22:41
@apeltzer
Copy link
Member

I think its fine. This was a design decision at some point in the past prior to moving towards nextflow, so I guess its time to get rid of it. Please move forward with the nf-tests :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants