Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add scan functionality to KA9Q radio mode #926

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 2, 2024

Conversation

ke5gdb
Copy link
Collaborator

@ke5gdb ke5gdb commented Oct 26, 2024

No description provided.

@ke5gdb ke5gdb force-pushed the testing-ka9q-scanner branch from c6fd62e to 4df48eb Compare November 2, 2024 04:19
@ke5gdb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ke5gdb commented Nov 2, 2024

I removed the commits that added the configuration hooks for the location of the KA9Q powers utility. The idea was half-baked and we should be ok with using the system paths.

@darksidelemm darksidelemm merged commit 79cc5e3 into projecthorus:testing Nov 2, 2024
6 checks passed
Comment on lines +25 to +38
libairspy-dev \
libairspyhf-dev \
libavahi-client-dev \
libbsd-dev \
libfftw3-dev \
libhackrf-dev \
libiniparser-dev \
libncurses5-dev \
libopus-dev \
librtlsdr-dev \
portaudio19-dev \
libasound2-dev \
uuid-dev \
rsync && \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suspect you could pare this list down to just libavahi-client-dev libbsd-dev libfftw3-dev libiniparser-dev libopus-dev if you only build the targets you need below, i.e. make -f Makefile.linux tune powers pcmcat. This might speed up the build a bit.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are correct! Removing those extra packages and better defining the make command worked as expected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants