Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SOAR-17745] Duo admin Improve handling of 429s in task code (#3048) #3067

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

lcwiklinski-r7
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Updating plugin.spec ([SOAR-18528] Whois plugin.spec (fedRAMP) #3047)

  • Duo admin Improve handling of 429s in task code

  • Linting the code

  • Version bump

  • Adjusting styling

  • Resolving static code analysis

  • Resolving plugin's validation

  • CR fixes

  • Additional test case

  • Bumping the SDK and linting the code


Proposed Changes

Description

Describe the proposed changes:

PR Requirements

Developers, verify you have completed the following items by checking them off:

Testing

Unit Tests

Review our documentation on generating and writing plugin unit tests

  • Unit tests written for any new or updated code

In-Product Tests

If you are an InsightConnect customer or have access to an InsightConnect instance, the following in-product tests should be done:

  • Screenshot of job output with the plugin changes
  • Screenshot of the changed connection, actions, or triggers input within the InsightConnect workflow builder

Style

Review the style guide

  • For dependencies, pin OS package and Python package versions
  • For security, set least privileged account with USER nobody in the Dockerfile when possible
  • For size, use the slim SDK images when possible: rapid7/insightconnect-python-3-38-slim-plugin:{sdk-version-num} and rapid7/insightconnect-python-3-38-plugin:{sdk-version-num}
  • For error handling, use of PluginException and ConnectionTestException
  • For logging, use self.logger
  • For docs, use changelog style
  • For docs, validate markdown with insight-plugin validate which calls icon_validate to lint help.md

Functional Checklist

  • Work fully completed
  • Functional
    • Any new actions/triggers include JSON test files in the tests/ directory created with insight-plugin samples
    • Tests should all pass unless it's a negative test. Negative tests have a naming convention of tests/$action_bad.json
    • Unsuccessful tests should fail by raising an exception causing the plugin to die and an object should be returned on successful test
    • Add functioning test results to PR, sanitize any output if necessary
      • Single action/trigger insight-plugin run -T tests/example.json --debug --jq
      • All actions/triggers shortcut insight-plugin run -T all --debug --jq (use PR format at end)
    • Add functioning run results to PR, sanitize any output if necessary
      • Single action/trigger insight-plugin run -R tests/example.json --debug --jq
      • All actions/triggers shortcut insight-plugin run --debug --jq (use PR format at end)

Assessment

You must validate your work to reviewers:

  1. Run insight-plugin validate and make sure everything passes
  2. Run the assessment tool: insight-plugin run -A. For single action validation: insight-plugin run tests/{file}.json -A
  3. Copy (insight-plugin ... | pbcopy) and paste the output in a new post on this PR
  4. Add required screenshots from the In-Product Tests section

* Updating plugin.spec (#3047)

* Duo admin Improve handling of 429s in task code

* Linting the code

* Version bump

* Adjusting styling

* Resolving static code analysis

* Resolving plugin's validation

* CR fixes

* Additional test case

* Bumping the SDK and linting the code

---------

Co-authored-by: rmurray-r7 <ryanj_murray@rapid7.com>
@lcwiklinski-r7 lcwiklinski-r7 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 29, 2025 10:54
@lcwiklinski-r7 lcwiklinski-r7 merged commit 8dc3939 into master Jan 29, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@lcwiklinski-r7 lcwiklinski-r7 deleted the duo_admin-5.0.3-release branch January 29, 2025 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants