Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(gitea): allow overriding platform version #34019

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

viceice
Copy link
Member

@viceice viceice commented Feb 4, 2025

Changes

Useful if the platfrom version is somehow different to what renovate expects, like on codeberg.org

$ curl -s https://codeberg.org/api/v1/version | jq
{
  "version": "10.0.0-58-7e1df53+gitea-1.22.0"
}

Context

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@viceice viceice added the priority-2-high Bugs impacting wide number of users or very important features label Feb 4, 2025
@viceice viceice requested review from rarkins and secustor February 4, 2025 08:02
@viceice viceice enabled auto-merge February 4, 2025 08:05
@viceice viceice added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit df1af91 Feb 4, 2025
39 checks passed
@viceice viceice deleted the fix/gitea/version-override branch February 4, 2025 08:49
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 39.158.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority-2-high Bugs impacting wide number of users or very important features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants