Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Readme and include in NuGet package #78

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Update Readme and include in NuGet package #78

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

rprouse
Copy link
Owner

@rprouse rprouse commented Sep 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced "Build Instructions" in the Build.md file for easy installation and testing of the dotnet-todo tool.
    • Added a comprehensive Help.md file detailing commands and options for the command-line todo application.
  • Documentation

    • Updated Readme.md to reflect the new .NET SDK requirement (8.0) and streamlined installation instructions.
  • Chores

    • Incremented version number from 0.6.1 to 0.6.2 in the project configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rprouse has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0475d4 and dc9a5ce.

Walkthrough

The changes involve the addition of new documentation files, Build.md and Help.md, to the dotnet-todo project, providing detailed build instructions and command usage for a command-line todo application. The Readme.md has been simplified, focusing on essential installation information and updating the required .NET SDK version. The project file todo.csproj has been updated with a new property for the README file and a version increment. Overall, the modifications enhance documentation clarity and structure.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Build.md New file added with build instructions for dotnet-todo.
Help.md New file added with comprehensive command documentation for the todo application.
Readme.md Updated to simplify installation instructions, removed detailed command descriptions, and clarified SDK version.
dotnet-todo.sln Added Build.md and Help.md to the "Solution Items" section.
src/todo/todo.csproj Added PackageReadmeFile property and updated Version from 0.6.1 to 0.6.2.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Split command line options from the Readme ( #52 )
Add a NuGet Readme ( #63 )

Poem

In the garden where the bunnies play,
New docs sprout up, brightening the day!
Build and Help, oh what a delight,
With clearer paths, our tasks feel light.
Hopping along, with joy we embrace,
A todo tool that quickens our pace! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
Build.md (2)

1-17: LGTM! Consider adding a troubleshooting note.

The "Testing Locally" section provides clear and concise instructions for building, packaging, and installing the tool. The use of relative paths in the commands enhances portability.

Consider adding a brief troubleshooting note or common issues that users might encounter during the local installation process. This could help users quickly resolve potential problems.


19-56: LGTM! Consider enhancing security for PAT storage.

The "Installing from GitHub Packages" section provides comprehensive instructions for configuring NuGet and installing the tool. The XML configuration example is clear and helpful.

For improved security, consider recommending the use of environment variables or a secure credential manager for storing the GitHub Personal Access Token (PAT) instead of storing it in clear text in the NuGet.Config file. This approach would help prevent accidental exposure of the PAT.

Example using environment variables:

<add key="ClearTextPassword" value="%GITHUB_PAT%" />

Then, users can set the environment variable:

setx GITHUB_PAT "your_pat_here"

This method keeps sensitive information out of configuration files while still allowing easy access for authorized processes.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~21-~21: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the noun “to-do” (= task) or did you mean the verb “to do”?
Context: ...ges Whenever the version is updated in src/todo/todo.csproj, a merge to master will pu...

(TO_DO_HYPHEN)

Readme.md (2)

17-17: Important update to required .NET SDK version

The required .NET SDK version has been updated from 6.0 to 8.0. This is a significant change that may affect users and should be prominently highlighted.

While streamlining the installation instructions aligns with the PR objective of making the readme more suitable for NuGet.org, consider the following:

  1. Add a note about this version change in a "What's New" or "Changes" section to draw attention to it.
  2. Consider keeping a link to more detailed installation instructions (e.g., for GitHub Packages) in a separate document, and reference it here for users who might need it.

34-39: Improved usage section with reference to --help

The addition of a reference to the --help command for a complete list of options is an excellent way to keep the readme concise while still providing users with access to all available options. This change aligns well with the PR objective of separating command line options from the main readme.

Consider adding a brief description of the most common or important options directly in the readme, to give users a quick overview without needing to run the --help command.

Help.md (2)

15-32: Minor improvements for clarity in 'addm' and 'addto' sections.

  1. In the addm section:

    • Line 17: There's a typo. "you" should be "your".
    • Consider adding a note that this command allows adding multiple tasks at once.
  2. In the addto section:

    • The example and the command syntax don't quite match. Consider updating the example to match the syntax or vice versa.

Here's a suggested improvement for the addm section:

 ### `addm`
 Adds "FIRST THING I NEED TO DO" to your todo.txt on its own line and
-adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to you todo.txt on its own line.
+adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to your todo.txt on its own line.
+
+This command allows adding multiple tasks at once.

And for the addto section:

 ### `addto`
 Adds a line of text to any file located in the todo.txt directory.
 
-For example, `addto inbox.txt "decide about vacation"`
+For example, `todo addto inbox.txt "decide about vacation"`
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...NEED TO DO" to your todo.txt on its own line and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~17-~17: “you” seems less likely than “your” (belonging to you).
Context: ...and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to you todo.txt on its own line. Project and ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOU_YOUR)


154-162: Minor inconsistency in the 'move' action description.

In the move action description, there's a slight inconsistency:

  • The description mentions "configuration directory", but earlier parts of the document refer to the "todo.txt directory".
  • The last sentence could be clearer about the default behavior.

Consider updating the description for consistency and clarity:

 ### `move`
 Moves a line from source text file (SRC) to destination text file (DEST). Both source
 and destination file must be located in the directory defined in the configuration
-directory. When SRC is not defined it's by default todo.txt.
+directory. When SRC is not specified, todo.txt is used as the default source file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~157-~157: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...onfiguration directory. When SRC is not defined it's by default todo.txt. ```shell tod...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between da44fb9 and 072bab3.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • Build.md (1 hunks)
  • Help.md (1 hunks)
  • Readme.md (2 hunks)
  • dotnet-todo.sln (1 hunks)
  • src/todo/todo.csproj (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
Build.md

[grammar] ~21-~21: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the noun “to-do” (= task) or did you mean the verb “to do”?
Context: ...ges Whenever the version is updated in src/todo/todo.csproj, a merge to master will pu...

(TO_DO_HYPHEN)

Help.md

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...NEED TO DO" to your todo.txt on its own line and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~17-~17: “you” seems less likely than “your” (belonging to you).
Context: ...and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to you todo.txt on its own line. Project and ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOU_YOUR)


[grammar] ~35-~35: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...s TEXT TO APPEND to the end of the task on line ITEM#. ```shell todo append ITEM# "TEX...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~57-~57: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...plicate ``` ### del Deletes the task on line ITEM# in todo.txt. If TERM specified, d...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~66-~66: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...(removes the priority) from the task(s) on line ITEM# in todo.txt. ```shell todo depri...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~74-~74: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...ITEM#, ...] ### `do` Marks task(s) on line ITEM# as done in todo.txt. shell to...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[uncategorized] ~157-~157: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...onfiguration directory. When SRC is not defined it's by default todo.txt. ```shell tod...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[grammar] ~165-~165: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...TO PREPEND to the beginning of the task on line ITEM#. ```shell todo prepend ITEM# "TE...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~173-~173: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...D" ``` ### pri Adds PRIORITY to task on line ITEM#. If the task is already prioriti...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~182-~182: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...IORITY ### `replace` Replaces task on line ITEM# with UPDATED TODO. shell todo...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)

🔇 Additional comments (10)
Build.md (2)

21-21: Clarification on project name "todo"

The project name "todo" in src/todo/todo.csproj is correct as-is. It refers to the specific project name and doesn't require a hyphen.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~21-~21: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the noun “to-do” (= task) or did you mean the verb “to do”?
Context: ...ges Whenever the version is updated in src/todo/todo.csproj, a merge to master will pu...

(TO_DO_HYPHEN)


1-56: Well-structured build instructions aligned with PR objectives

This new Build.md file effectively addresses the PR objectives by providing clear and comprehensive build instructions. It supports the goal of improving documentation for NuGet users by detailing both local testing and installation from GitHub Packages. The content is well-organized and user-friendly, which aligns with the aim of enhancing the package's usability on NuGet.org.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~21-~21: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the noun “to-do” (= task) or did you mean the verb “to do”?
Context: ...ges Whenever the version is updated in src/todo/todo.csproj, a merge to master will pu...

(TO_DO_HYPHEN)

src/todo/todo.csproj (2)

17-17: Version update looks good

The version has been correctly incremented from 0.6.1 to 0.6.2. This minor version update is appropriate for the changes described in the PR objectives.


Line range hint 1-57: Verify inclusion of all necessary files for NuGet package

While the changes made align with the PR objectives, it's important to ensure that all necessary files are included in the NuGet package. This includes the main README, the NuGet-specific README, and potentially a separate file for command line options if it has been created.

Please verify that all required files are properly referenced in the project file for inclusion in the NuGet package. You may need to add <None Include="..."> elements for any new files created as part of this PR.

To help verify the inclusion of necessary files, you can run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all .md files in the repository and check their inclusion in the .csproj file

echo "Markdown files in the repository:"
fd -t f -e md

echo "\nFiles included in the .csproj:"
grep -n '<None Include=' src/todo/todo.csproj
Readme.md (2)

3-4: Great addition of status badges!

The inclusion of build status and NuGet download badges enhances the readme by providing quick visual indicators of the project's status and popularity. This aligns well with the PR objective of improving the visual representation of the project.


1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Overall structure improvements and NuGet-specific readme

The streamlined structure of the readme, focusing on essential information (installation, usage, and configuration), aligns well with the PR objective of making it more suitable for NuGet.org. The improved readability and usability are commendable.

However, there are two important points to address:

  1. NuGet-specific readme: The PR objectives mention creating a dedicated readme for the NuGet package (issue Add a NuGet Readme #63). This doesn't seem to be addressed in the current changes. Consider creating a separate NuGet-README.md file that adheres to NuGet.org guidelines and is optimized for display on the NuGet package page.

  2. Balancing conciseness and completeness: While the streamlined content is good for quick understanding, ensure that users can easily find more detailed information if needed. Consider adding links to external documentation or separate markdown files for in-depth explanations of actions, options, and advanced usage scenarios.

To verify the existence of a NuGet-specific readme, run the following script:

Help.md (3)

1-186: Well-structured and comprehensive documentation.

The "Help" file provides clear and detailed documentation for the command-line todo application. The structure is logical, with each action well-explained and accompanied by usage examples. This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of separating command-line options from the main README.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...NEED TO DO" to your todo.txt on its own line and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~17-~17: “you” seems less likely than “your” (belonging to you).
Context: ...and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to you todo.txt on its own line. Project and ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOU_YOUR)


[grammar] ~35-~35: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...s TEXT TO APPEND to the end of the task on line ITEM#. ```shell todo append ITEM# "TEX...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~57-~57: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...plicate ``` ### del Deletes the task on line ITEM# in todo.txt. If TERM specified, d...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~66-~66: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...(removes the priority) from the task(s) on line ITEM# in todo.txt. ```shell todo depri...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~74-~74: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...ITEM#, ...] ### `do` Marks task(s) on line ITEM# as done in todo.txt. shell to...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[uncategorized] ~157-~157: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...onfiguration directory. When SRC is not defined it's by default todo.txt. ```shell tod...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[grammar] ~165-~165: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...TO PREPEND to the beginning of the task on line ITEM#. ```shell todo prepend ITEM# "TE...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~173-~173: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...D" ``` ### pri Adds PRIORITY to task on line ITEM#. If the task is already prioriti...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~182-~182: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...IORITY ### `replace` Replaces task on line ITEM# with UPDATED TODO. shell todo...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


188-215: Clear and concise documentation of command-line options.

The "Options" section provides clear and concise descriptions of various command-line options. This documentation aligns well with the PR objective and should be very helpful for users of the todo application.


1-215: Excellent documentation that meets PR objectives.

This Help.md file successfully addresses the PR objectives by providing comprehensive documentation for the todo application, separate from the main README. The content is well-structured, with detailed descriptions of actions and options, accompanied by clear examples. This separation and level of detail will significantly improve the usability of the package on NuGet.org.

A few minor suggestions have been made in previous comments to further enhance clarity and consistency. Once these are addressed, this file will serve as an excellent resource for users of the todo application.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...NEED TO DO" to your todo.txt on its own line and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~17-~17: “you” seems less likely than “your” (belonging to you).
Context: ...and adds "SECOND THING I NEED TO DO" to you todo.txt on its own line. Project and ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOU_YOUR)


[grammar] ~35-~35: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...s TEXT TO APPEND to the end of the task on line ITEM#. ```shell todo append ITEM# "TEX...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~57-~57: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...plicate ``` ### del Deletes the task on line ITEM# in todo.txt. If TERM specified, d...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~66-~66: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...(removes the priority) from the task(s) on line ITEM# in todo.txt. ```shell todo depri...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~74-~74: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...ITEM#, ...] ### `do` Marks task(s) on line ITEM# as done in todo.txt. shell to...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[uncategorized] ~157-~157: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...onfiguration directory. When SRC is not defined it's by default todo.txt. ```shell tod...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[grammar] ~165-~165: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...TO PREPEND to the beginning of the task on line ITEM#. ```shell todo prepend ITEM# "TE...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~173-~173: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...D" ``` ### pri Adds PRIORITY to task on line ITEM#. If the task is already prioriti...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)


[grammar] ~182-~182: Did you mean the adverb or adjective “online”?
Context: ...IORITY ### `replace` Replaces task on line ITEM# with UPDATED TODO. shell todo...

(ON_COMPOUNDS)

dotnet-todo.sln (1)

11-12: LGTM! New documentation files added to Solution Items.

The addition of Build.md and Help.md to the Solution Items aligns well with the PR objectives. This change should help in separating the command line options from the main Readme and potentially provide build instructions for NuGet users.

Let's verify if these new files exist in the repository:

✅ Verification successful

Verified! Build.md and Help.md have been successfully added to the repository.

The presence of both Build.md and Help.md confirms that the new documentation files are correctly integrated into the Solution Items. This addition effectively separates the command line options from the main Readme and provides dedicated documentation for NuGet users.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of new documentation files
echo "Checking for Build.md and Help.md:"
ls Build.md Help.md

Length of output: 117

@@ -12,8 +12,9 @@
<PackageLicenseFile>LICENSE</PackageLicenseFile>
<PackageProjectUrl>https://github.com/rprouse/dotnet-todo</PackageProjectUrl>
<RepositoryUrl>https://github.com/rprouse/dotnet-todo</RepositoryUrl>
<PackageReadmeFile>../../Readme.md</PackageReadmeFile>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Incorrect README file path

The PackageReadmeFile property is set to ../../Readme.md, but this file does not exist at that location. Ensure the path correctly points to the existing Readme.md in the repository.

Possible actions:

  • Update the path to ../Readme.md if the todo.csproj file is located one directory deep from the repository root.
  • Verify the directory structure to determine the accurate relative path.
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the README file path

The addition of the PackageReadmeFile property aligns with the PR objective of including a NuGet-specific README. However, the path "../../Readme.md" points to a location two directories up from the project file. This might not be the intended location for the NuGet-specific README.

Please verify if this is the correct path for the NuGet README. If not, consider adjusting it to point to the correct location.

To help verify the file location, you can run the following script:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and location of the Readme.md file

# Test: Check if the file exists at the specified path
if [ -f "../../Readme.md" ]; then
  echo "Readme.md found at ../../Readme.md"
else
  echo "Readme.md not found at ../../Readme.md"
  echo "Searching for Readme.md files in the repository:"
  fd -t f -e md -i readme
fi

Length of output: 375


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and location of the Readme.md file

# Test: Check if the file exists at the specified path
if [ -f "../../Readme.md" ]; then
  echo "Readme.md found at ../../Readme.md"
else
  echo "Readme.md not found at ../../Readme.md"
  echo "Searching for Readme.md files in the repository:"
  fd -t f -e md -i readme
fi

Length of output: 258

@@ -1,75 +1,20 @@
# Dotnet Todo.txt CLI
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider the impact of removing actions and options sections

While the removal of detailed actions and options sections aligns with the PR objective of streamlining the readme for NuGet.org, it's important to ensure that users can still easily access this information. Consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add a brief overview of the most common actions and options in the readme.
  2. Create a separate markdown file (e.g., USAGE.md) with detailed actions and options, and link to it from the main readme.
  3. Ensure that the --help command output is comprehensive and user-friendly.

These steps will help maintain a balance between a concise readme and providing necessary information to users.

@rprouse rprouse merged commit 425a3ea into main Sep 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@rprouse rprouse deleted the issue/52 branch September 30, 2024 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a NuGet Readme Split command line options from the Readme
1 participant