Source chain specific RMN blessings enable/disable (wip)

[dimkouv]

For initial reviewers:

This PR introduces per-source RMN disabling/enabling.
So far it was globally enabled/disabled.

This required contract changes (check branch diff), affecting offRamp config, commitReport and commitReportAccepted events. The RMN-enabled offRamp config has been moved to per-source and relevant changes were made to the changesets. I'd like a very careful review on this changeset changes to make sure the behavior remains the same on all the envs and tests. Meaning we want to keep the same chains RMN-enabled/disabled as it was before but by using the new config.

[github-actions]

I see you updated files related to core. Please run pnpm changeset in the root directory to add a changeset as well as in the text include at least one of the following tags:

• #added For any new functionality added.
• #breaking_change For any functionality that requires manual action for the node to boot.
• #bugfix For bug fixes.
• #changed For any change to the existing functionality.
• #db_update For any feature that introduces updates to database schema.
• #deprecation_notice For any upcoming deprecation functionality.
• #internal For changesets that need to be excluded from the final changelog.
• #nops For any feature that is NOP facing and needs to be in the official Release Notes for the release.
• #removed For any functionality/config that is removed.
• #updated For any functionality that is updated.
• #wip For any change that is not ready yet and external communication about it should be held off till it is feature complete.

🎖️ No JIRA issue number found in: PR title, commit message, or branch name. Please include the issue ID in one of these.

[github-actions]

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

[github-actions]

Flakeguard Summary

Ran new or updated tests between fix-rmn and efe73cb (dk/per-src-rmnDisable).

View Flaky Detector Details | Compare Changes

Found Flaky Tests ❌

Name	Pass Ratio	Panicked?	Timed Out?	Race?	Runs	Successes	Failures	Skips	Package	Package Panicked?	Avg Duration	Code Owners
Test_ActiveCandidate	0.00%	false	false	false	3	0	3	0	github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/deployment/ccip/changeset	true	8m56.96s	@AnieeG, @kylesmartin, @smartcontractkit/ccip-offchain, @smartcontractkit/deployment-automation
Test_RevokeCandidate	0.00%	true	true	false	3	0	3	0	github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/deployment/ccip/changeset	true	0s	@AnieeG, @kylesmartin, @smartcontractkit/ccip-offchain, @smartcontractkit/deployment-automation

Artifacts

For detailed logs of the failed tests, please refer to the artifact failed-test-results-with-logs.json.

[carte7000]

Should we have a smoke test that sends a report with unblessed and blessed roots?

[github-actions]

Flakeguard Summary

Ran new or updated tests between fix-rmn and b385278 (dk/per-src-rmnDisable).

View Flaky Detector Details | Compare Changes

Found Flaky Tests ❌

1 Results

Name	Pass Ratio	Panicked?	Timed Out?	Race?	Runs	Successes	Failures	Skips	Package	Package Panicked?	Avg Duration	Code Owners
TestDeployerGroupMCMS	50.00%	true	true	false	3	1	2	0	github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/deployment/ccip/changeset	true	10.14s	@AnieeG, @kylesmartin, @smartcontractkit/ccip-offchain, @smartcontractkit/deployment-automation

Artifacts

For detailed logs of the failed tests, please refer to the artifact failed-test-results-with-logs.json.

[cl-sonarqube-production]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
16.1% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 10%)

See analysis details on SonarQube