Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update icons and structure in automation carousel #32

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

flaviosalesv
Copy link
Collaborator

@flaviosalesv flaviosalesv commented Nov 18, 2024

This pull request updates the icons and structure of the automation carousel. A new automation-icon.tsx component has been created for better icon management. Layout adjustments were made to improve the display and organization of the component.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new AutomationIcon component to enhance the icon display in the AutomationCarousel.
    • Updated icons for "Label PR Size," "PR Title Requirements," "Notify Stale PRs," and "Code Freeze" to use the new component.
    • Added a tooltip component for improved user interaction and context.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved icon handling by ensuring only valid icon types are rendered, preventing potential errors.
  • Refactor

    • Replaced inline icon implementations with a more modular approach using the new AutomationIcon component.
    • Transitioned CSS to utilize Tailwind CSS for better maintainability and customization.

@sweetr-dev sweetr-dev bot added the small Small PR - Quick and easy to review label Nov 18, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the modification of the AutomationCarousel component to replace inline icon implementations with a new AutomationIcon component. This new component is designed to render icons based on a specified type, and several icons previously imported from @tabler/icons-react have been removed. Additionally, a new file defining the AutomationIcon component has been introduced, which includes logic for rendering different icons based on props. Other updates include changes to CSS, the introduction of a tooltip component, utility functions, and configuration files for Tailwind CSS and TypeScript.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx Updated to use AutomationIcon for rendering icons instead of inline imports. Removed imports for IconBug, IconClockBolt, and IconGavel.
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx Introduced a new AutomationIcon component with an IconType type, AutomationIconProps interface, and logic for icon rendering based on type.
apps/mkt/app/css/style.css Transitioned to Tailwind CSS syntax, added CSS custom properties for theming, and structured styles within @layer blocks.
apps/mkt/components/ui/tooltip.tsx Added a new tooltip component using Radix UI, including TooltipProvider, Tooltip, TooltipTrigger, and TooltipContent.
apps/mkt/lib/utils.ts Introduced a new utility function cn for merging Tailwind CSS class names.
apps/mkt/components.json Added a new JSON configuration file for application components with Tailwind CSS settings and aliases.
apps/mkt/package.json Updated to include new dependencies and devDependencies relevant to the project.
apps/mkt/shadcn.d.ts Introduced a module declaration for @shadcn/ui for TypeScript support.
apps/mkt/tailwind.config.js Modified Tailwind CSS configuration to support dark mode and restructured color definitions.
apps/mkt/tsconfig.json Updated TypeScript configuration to modern module resolution and ECMAScript target.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: automation carousel enhancements #30: This PR modifies the same AutomationCarousel component in automation-carousel.tsx, specifically involving the same icon components (IconBug, IconClockBolt, IconGavel) that are replaced in the main PR with the new AutomationIcon component.

Suggested labels

small

Suggested reviewers

  • waltergalvao

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-icon.tsx (2)

4-6: Add JSDoc documentation for the interface.

While the interface is well-defined, adding JSDoc documentation would improve code maintainability and developer experience.

+/**
+ * Props for the AutomationIcon component.
+ * @extends TablerIconsProps
+ */
 interface AutomationIconProps extends TablerIconsProps {
+  /** The icon component to be rendered */
   IconComponent: React.FC<TablerIconsProps>;
 }

8-19: Consider making icon container dimensions configurable.

The implementation is clean and follows React best practices. However, the fixed dimensions (28px) in the container div might limit reusability in different contexts.

Consider making the dimensions configurable through props:

 interface AutomationIconProps extends TablerIconsProps {
   IconComponent: React.FC<TablerIconsProps>;
+  containerSize?: string;
 }

 const AutomationIcon: React.FC<AutomationIconProps> = ({
   IconComponent,
   color = "#fff",
   stroke = 1.5,
+  containerSize = "28px",
   ...props
 }) => {
   return (
-    <div className="rounded p-[4px] bg-dark-600 border border-dark-400 flex items-center justify-center w-[28px] h-[28px]">
+    <div className={`rounded p-[4px] bg-dark-600 border border-dark-400 flex items-center justify-center`} style={{ width: containerSize, height: containerSize }}>
       <IconComponent color={color} stroke={stroke} {...props} />
     </div>
   );
 };
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (1)

72-73: Consider reviewing icon choices for better semantic meaning

The IconBug is currently used for both "Label PR Size" and "Code Freeze" features, which might not provide the most intuitive visual representation. Consider using more semantically appropriate icons:

  • For "Label PR Size": Consider using IconRuler or IconTag
  • For "Code Freeze": Consider using IconSnowflake or IconLock

Also applies to: 157-157

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea33f0a and 40a11c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-icon.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-icon.tsx (2)

1-2: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports.

The imports are well-organized and include only the necessary dependencies.


21-21: LGTM! Appropriate export statement.

The default export is correct for this single-component file.

apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (2)

9-9: LGTM: Clean import of the new AutomationIcon component

The import statement is properly placed and aligns with the component restructuring mentioned in the PR objectives.


72-73: LGTM: Clean implementation of AutomationIcon component

The AutomationIcon component is consistently implemented across all carousel slides, improving code maintainability and readability.

Also applies to: 101-101, 129-129, 157-157

Copy link
Member

@waltergalvao waltergalvao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice :) good job getting it working.

I'm leaving a few comments on some small tweaks for us to do, let me know if you have any questions.

Comment on lines 8 to 13
const AutomationIcon: React.FC<AutomationIconProps> = ({
IconComponent,
color = "#fff",
stroke = 1.5,
...props
}) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This way works, and it's fine, but just for standardization, we usually just declare the type like this:

Suggested change
const AutomationIcon: React.FC<AutomationIconProps> = ({
IconComponent,
color = "#fff",
stroke = 1.5,
...props
}) => {
const AutomationIcon = ({
IconComponent,
color = "#fff",
stroke = 1.5,
...props
}: AutomationIconProps) => {

import { TablerIconsProps } from "@tabler/icons-react";

interface AutomationIconProps extends TablerIconsProps {
IconComponent: React.FC<TablerIconsProps>;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of receiving an icon component as a property, we want a string to indicate what kind of benefit the icon is about.

Take a look at https://github.com/sweetr-dev/sweetr.dev/blob/main/apps/web/src/app/automations/components/icon-automation-benefit/icon-automation-benefit.tsx

Would be something like this:

Suggested change
IconComponent: React.FC<TablerIconsProps>;
type: 'cycleTime' | 'failureRate' | 'compliance' | 'security' | 'techDebt';

then you'll need additional logic to display the correct icon. See the getIcon method in https://github.com/sweetr-dev/sweetr.dev/blob/main/apps/web/src/app/automations/components/icon-automation-benefit/icon-automation-benefit.tsx#L24

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's call this automation-benefit-icon.tsx, as it's about the benefit the automation gives.

@waltergalvao waltergalvao removed the small Small PR - Quick and easy to review label Nov 19, 2024
@sweetr-dev sweetr-dev bot added the small Small PR - Quick and easy to review label Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx (3)

9-21: Add JSDoc comments to improve type documentation.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose and usage of each icon type, which would improve maintainability and developer experience.

+/**
+ * Types of automation icons available in the system
+ */
 type IconType =
   | "cycleTime"
   | "failureRate"
   | "compliance"
   | "security"
   | "techDebt"
   | "prTitle";

+/**
+ * Props for the AutomationIcon component
+ * @property {IconType} type - The type of icon to display
+ * @property {string} [color] - Optional color for the icon
+ * @property {number} [stroke] - Optional stroke width for the icon
+ */
 interface AutomationIconProps {
   type: IconType;
   color?: string;
   stroke?: number;
 }

23-40: Consider using distinct icons for different purposes.

The IconHammer is currently used for both "techDebt" and "prTitle", which might be confusing. Consider using different icons to better represent each concept.

Consider memoizing the icon mapping for better performance.

The icon mapping could be memoized to avoid unnecessary re-renders.

+const iconMap = {
+  cycleTime: IconClock,
+  failureRate: IconBug,
+  compliance: IconAdjustments,
+  security: IconShield,
+  techDebt: IconHammer,
+  prTitle: IconHammer, // Consider using a different icon
+} as const;
+
 const getIcon = (type: IconType) => {
-  switch (type) {
-    case "cycleTime":
-      return IconClock;
-    case "failureRate":
-      return IconBug;
-    case "compliance":
-      return IconAdjustments;
-    case "security":
-      return IconShield;
-    case "techDebt":
-      return IconHammer;
-    case "prTitle":
-      return IconHammer;
-    default:
-      throw new Error(`Unknown icon type: ${type}`);
-  }
+  const IconComponent = iconMap[type];
+  if (!IconComponent) {
+    throw new Error(`Unknown icon type: ${type}`);
+  }
+  return IconComponent;
 };

42-55: Consider making the styling more configurable.

The component currently has hardcoded styles for dimensions and colors. Consider making these configurable through props for better reusability.

 interface AutomationIconProps {
   type: IconType;
   color?: string;
   stroke?: number;
+  size?: number;
+  className?: string;
 }

 const AutomationIcon = ({
   type,
   color = "#fff",
   stroke = 1.5,
+  size = 28,
+  className = "",
   ...props
 }: AutomationIconProps) => {
   const IconComponent = getIcon(type);

   return (
     <div 
-      className="rounded p-[4px] bg-dark-600 border border-dark-400 flex items-center justify-center w-[28px] h-[28px]"
+      className={`rounded p-[4px] bg-dark-600 border border-dark-400 flex items-center justify-center ${className}`}
+      style={{ width: `${size}px`, height: `${size}px` }}
     >
       <IconComponent color={color} stroke={stroke} {...props} />
     </div>
   );
 };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40a11c4 and 723ee2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx (2)

1-7: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.

All imported icons are properly utilized in the component.


57-57: LGTM! Export statement is appropriate.

Default export is suitable for a single component file.

Copy link
Member

@waltergalvao waltergalvao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better :) a few final details and we are ready to go

}
};

const AutomationIcon = ({
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const AutomationIcon = ({
export const AutomationIcon = ({

);
};

export default AutomationIcon;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We usually avoid doing export default in components, so it's easier for VSCode to auto import when necessary.

Comment on lines 23 to 40
const getIcon = (type: IconType) => {
switch (type) {
case "cycleTime":
return IconClock;
case "failureRate":
return IconBug;
case "compliance":
return IconAdjustments;
case "security":
return IconShield;
case "techDebt":
return IconHammer;
case "prTitle":
return IconHammer;
default:
throw new Error(`Unknown icon type: ${type}`);
}
};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This works well - I'll suggest to convert it to an object though, it's a bit less verbose :)

You can do something like

const icons: Record<IconType, ReactElement> = {
   cycleTime: IconClock,
   ...
}

return icons[type];

@sweetr-dev sweetr-dev bot added huge Huge PR - High risk of reviewer fatigue and removed small Small PR - Quick and easy to review labels Dec 12, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx (1)

64-70: Consider improving tooltip content implementation

  1. Add missing tooltip content for "prTitle" type
  2. Consider moving tooltip content to a mapping object for better maintainability:
const tooltipContent: Record<IconType, string> = {
  cycleTime: "Improves cycle time",
  compliance: "Improves compliance",
  failureRate: "Improves failure rate",
  security: "Improves security",
  techDebt: "Improves tech debt",
  prTitle: "Improves PR title consistency"
};

// Then in JSX:
<TooltipContent>
  {tooltipContent[type]}
</TooltipContent>
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 65-65: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 66-66: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 67-67: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 68-68: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 69-69: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 723ee2d and 20fc01b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • apps/mkt/app/css/style.css (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/components.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (5 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/components/ui/tooltip.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/lib/utils.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/shadcn.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
  • apps/mkt/tsconfig.json (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • apps/mkt/shadcn.d.ts
  • apps/mkt/components.json
  • apps/mkt/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
apps/mkt/app/css/style.css

[error] 4-4: This @import is in the wrong position.

Any @import rules must precede all other valid at-rules and style rules in a stylesheet (ignoring @charset and @layer), or else the @import rule is invalid.
Consider moving import position.

(lint/correctness/noInvalidPositionAtImportRule)


[error] 5-5: This @import is in the wrong position.

Any @import rules must precede all other valid at-rules and style rules in a stylesheet (ignoring @charset and @layer), or else the @import rule is invalid.
Consider moving import position.

(lint/correctness/noInvalidPositionAtImportRule)


[error] 8-8: This @import is in the wrong position.

Any @import rules must precede all other valid at-rules and style rules in a stylesheet (ignoring @charset and @layer), or else the @import rule is invalid.
Consider moving import position.

(lint/correctness/noInvalidPositionAtImportRule)


[error] 9-9: This @import is in the wrong position.

Any @import rules must precede all other valid at-rules and style rules in a stylesheet (ignoring @charset and @layer), or else the @import rule is invalid.
Consider moving import position.

(lint/correctness/noInvalidPositionAtImportRule)


[error] 11-11: This @import is in the wrong position.

Any @import rules must precede all other valid at-rules and style rules in a stylesheet (ignoring @charset and @layer), or else the @import rule is invalid.
Consider moving import position.

(lint/correctness/noInvalidPositionAtImportRule)

apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx

[error] 65-65: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 66-66: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 67-67: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 68-68: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 69-69: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)

🔇 Additional comments (10)
apps/mkt/tailwind.config.js (2)

146-146: Verify installation of tailwindcss-animate plugin

Ensure that the tailwindcss-animate plugin is installed in your project dependencies. If it's not installed, importing it in the Tailwind configuration will result in build errors.

Run the following script to check if tailwindcss-animate is installed:

✅ Verification successful

tailwindcss-animate plugin is properly installed

The plugin is correctly listed as a dependency in apps/mkt/package.json with version ^1.0.7.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'tailwindcss-animate' is listed in package.json dependencies.

# Test: Search for 'tailwindcss-animate' in package.json. Expect: At least one occurrence indicating the plugin is installed.
grep '"tailwindcss-animate"' apps/mkt/package.json

Length of output: 89


3-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Misplaced content property in Tailwind configuration

The content property is incorrectly nested under the darkMode property. It should be at the root level of the configuration object. This misplacement can prevent Tailwind CSS from scanning your files for class names, leading to missing styles or purging necessary CSS.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

 module.exports = {
     darkMode: ["class"],
+    content: [
+      "./app/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
+      "./pages/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
+      "./components/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
+    ],
     theme: {
-    content: [
-      "./app/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
-      "./pages/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
-      "./components/**/*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
-    ],
       extend: {

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

apps/mkt/lib/utils.ts (1)

4-6: Utility function cn is well-implemented

The cn function effectively combines class names using clsx and resolves Tailwind CSS class conflicts with twMerge. This enhances class name management and ensures styles are applied correctly.

apps/mkt/tsconfig.json (1)

3-3: Verify compatibility of updated TypeScript compiler options

The changes to "target": "esnext", "module": "Node16", "moduleResolution": "node16", and adding "allowSyntheticDefaultImports": true enhance support for modern JavaScript features and Node.js module resolution. However, ensure that your development and deployment environments support these settings, especially if the code needs to run in browsers or environments not compatible with ESNext features or Node.js 16.

Also applies to: 11-12, 26-26

apps/mkt/components/ui/tooltip.tsx (1)

14-28: TooltipContent component is correctly implemented

The TooltipContent component uses React.forwardRef appropriately, enhancing reusability and ref forwarding. The usage of the cn utility function for class name management improves readability, and the component is well-structured with proper type annotations.

apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-benefit-icon.tsx (3)

1-36: LGTM! Well-structured types and imports

The type definitions and imports are well-organized, providing good type safety and clear component structure.


38-45: LGTM! Clean implementation of icon mapping

The implementation follows the suggested pattern using Record type, providing a clean and type-safe mapping of icons.


47-62: LGTM! Clean component implementation

The component implementation follows React best practices with proper props handling and defaults.

apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (2)

8-8: LGTM! Clean import replacement

The replacement of individual icon imports with the new AutomationIcon component aligns well with the PR objectives.


Line range hint 71-156: LGTM! Consistent implementation of AutomationIcon

The AutomationIcon component is used consistently throughout the carousel, with appropriate icon types chosen for each feature context.

Comment on lines +4 to +5
@import "tailwindcss/base";
@import "tailwindcss/components";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Reorder @import statements to the top of the file

The @import statements on lines 4-5, 8-9, and 11 should be placed at the very beginning of the CSS file, before any other declarations, including @tailwind directives. According to CSS specifications, all @import rules must precede all other at-rules and style rules (except @charset and @layer) to ensure they are correctly processed.

Apply this diff to correct the order:

+@import "tailwindcss/base";
+@import "tailwindcss/components";
+@import "additional-styles/utility-patterns.css";
+@import "additional-styles/theme.css";
+@import "tailwindcss/utilities";

-@tailwind base;
-@tailwind components;
-@tailwind utilities;
-@import "tailwindcss/base";
-@import "tailwindcss/components";

-@import "additional-styles/utility-patterns.css";
-@import "additional-styles/theme.css";

-@import "tailwindcss/utilities";
+@tailwind base;
+@tailwind components;
+@tailwind utilities;

This rearranges the @import statements to the top and retains the @tailwind directives in the correct order.

Also applies to: 8-9, 11-11

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 4-4: This @import is in the wrong position.

Any @import rules must precede all other valid at-rules and style rules in a stylesheet (ignoring @charset and @layer), or else the @import rule is invalid.
Consider moving import position.

(lint/correctness/noInvalidPositionAtImportRule)


[error] 5-5: This @import is in the wrong position.

Any @import rules must precede all other valid at-rules and style rules in a stylesheet (ignoring @charset and @layer), or else the @import rule is invalid.
Consider moving import position.

(lint/correctness/noInvalidPositionAtImportRule)

Comment on lines +64 to +70
<TooltipContent>
{type === "cycleTime" && <>Improves cycle time</>}
{type === "compliance" && <>Improves compliance</>}
{type === "failureRate" && <>Improves failure rate</>}
{type === "security" && <>Improves security</>}
{type === "techDebt" && <>Improves tech debt</>}
</TooltipContent>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove unnecessary Fragment usage

The Fragment wrappers around single text elements are redundant and can be removed.

-          {type === "cycleTime" && <>Improves cycle time</>}
-          {type === "compliance" && <>Improves compliance</>}
-          {type === "failureRate" && <>Improves failure rate</>}
-          {type === "security" && <>Improves security</>}
-          {type === "techDebt" && <>Improves tech debt</>}
+          {type === "cycleTime" && "Improves cycle time"}
+          {type === "compliance" && "Improves compliance"}
+          {type === "failureRate" && "Improves failure rate"}
+          {type === "security" && "Improves security"}
+          {type === "techDebt" && "Improves tech debt"}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<TooltipContent>
{type === "cycleTime" && <>Improves cycle time</>}
{type === "compliance" && <>Improves compliance</>}
{type === "failureRate" && <>Improves failure rate</>}
{type === "security" && <>Improves security</>}
{type === "techDebt" && <>Improves tech debt</>}
</TooltipContent>
<TooltipContent>
{type === "cycleTime" && "Improves cycle time"}
{type === "compliance" && "Improves compliance"}
{type === "failureRate" && "Improves failure rate"}
{type === "security" && "Improves security"}
{type === "techDebt" && "Improves tech debt"}
</TooltipContent>
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 65-65: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 66-66: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 67-67: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 68-68: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)


[error] 69-69: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.

A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment

(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)

@sweetrdev sweetrdev self-requested a review December 19, 2024 00:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
huge Huge PR - High risk of reviewer fatigue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants