Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add mysql 8.4 docker images #17529

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

L3o-pold
Copy link
Collaborator

@L3o-pold L3o-pold commented Jan 15, 2025

Description

Add MySQL8.4 docker images

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #17519

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jan 15, 2025
@L3o-pold L3o-pold force-pushed the feature/mysql84-docker-image branch 2 times, most recently from ac13068 to 4a50e03 Compare January 15, 2025 14:07
@L3o-pold L3o-pold changed the title feat: add mysql 8.4 docker image feat: add mysql 8.4 docker images Jan 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Jan 15, 2025
@L3o-pold L3o-pold marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 14:23
@L3o-pold L3o-pold force-pushed the feature/mysql84-docker-image branch from 4a50e03 to 9dd14c1 Compare January 15, 2025 16:42
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.69%. Comparing base (db4fca3) to head (24589d6).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/tools/go-upgrade/go-upgrade.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #17529   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.68%   67.69%           
=======================================
  Files        1584     1584           
  Lines      254630   254720   +90     
=======================================
+ Hits       172356   172422   +66     
- Misses      82274    82298   +24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@L3o-pold L3o-pold force-pushed the feature/mysql84-docker-image branch from 9dd14c1 to 3d9e219 Compare January 15, 2025 17:34
@L3o-pold L3o-pold force-pushed the feature/mysql84-docker-image branch from 3d9e219 to 54712fa Compare January 15, 2025 18:14
@frouioui frouioui added Type: CI/Build Component: Docker and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jan 15, 2025
@L3o-pold L3o-pold force-pushed the feature/mysql84-docker-image branch 3 times, most recently from 3e1d7f9 to 24589d6 Compare January 16, 2025 08:23
@L3o-pold L3o-pold force-pushed the feature/mysql84-docker-image branch 3 times, most recently from 30db9c3 to f6a5cf8 Compare January 21, 2025 10:41
Signed-off-by: Leopold Jacquot <leopold.jacquot@infomaniak.com>
@L3o-pold L3o-pold force-pushed the feature/mysql84-docker-image branch from f6a5cf8 to 4f7dfd1 Compare January 21, 2025 11:06
@L3o-pold L3o-pold requested review from dbussink and frouioui January 21, 2025 12:04
Copy link
Contributor

@dbussink dbussink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question for @frouioui, otherwise looks good to me.

@@ -162,3 +162,4 @@ List of changes between bootstrap image versions.
## [41] - 2025-01-15
### Changes
- Update base image to bookworm
- Add MySQL84 image
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@frouioui Do we need to bump this to 42 now that we add this new image?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@L3o-pold L3o-pold Jan 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For me we don't as we add a new image and we are not editing a new one, but it's only my opinion.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I don't think we should bump it to 42. We will just build the new (mysql84) tag for 41.

@frouioui
Copy link
Member

I have built and pushed the new :41-mysql84 tag for the bootstrap image: https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/vitess/bootstrap/tags/41-mysql84/sha256-274e1d113b6ea8616a253155cf7c8206aaf2d695f14018c6109c97e6c4c8318b

Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The docker build looks good to me:

root@vitess-testing:~/vitess# make docker_lite_mysql84
Building vitess/lite:mysql84
...
...
 => => exporting layers                                                                                                                                                                                    6.1s 
 => => writing image sha256:34c5e32d982a5165e23d775284b1f89118244d522f8e9f49b701465849a60781                                                                                                               0.0s 
 => => naming to docker.io/vitess/lite:mysql84                                                                                                                                                             0.0s 
root@vitess-testing:~/vitess#    

Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Thanks a bunch for working on this @L3o-pold ❤️

@frouioui
Copy link
Member

frouioui commented Jan 21, 2025

Before merging, quick question, were you able to verify that the new image fixes the bug you described in #17519?

Edit: It should be okay, but may as well double check.

root@vitess-testing:~/vitess# docker run -it docker.io/vitess/lite:mysql84 bash                                                                                                                                 
vitess@9ea46cf53580:/$ xtrabackup --version 
2025-01-21T15:02:15.851047-00:00 0 [Note] [MY-011825] [Xtrabackup] recognized server arguments: --datadir=/var/lib/mysql 
xtrabackup version 8.4.0-2 based on MySQL server 8.4.0 Linux (x86_64) (revision id: d4373834)
vitess@9ea46cf53580:/$ 

@L3o-pold
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't, we rollbacked to 8.0 as 8.4 is experimental in Vitess

@frouioui frouioui merged commit 4370a48 into vitessio:main Jan 21, 2025
101 checks passed
@GrahamCampbell
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like this has the wrong version of Golang, causing builds to fail. See #17601.

garfthoffman pushed a commit to github/vitess-gh that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
Signed-off-by: Leopold Jacquot <leopold.jacquot@infomaniak.com>
Signed-off-by: garfthoffman <109185460+garfthoffman@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug Report: XtraBackup with MySQL 8.4
4 participants